🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When including those costs versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many our government's military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.