🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.