🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

A letter obtained by media originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting amendments to a pending law that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. Last month, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “black market” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for various offences “extending from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of the Zambian branch says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We live in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with applicable local laws. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which allow for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, adding that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which includes growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.